QΑEsQΑo^tH[
[¨mηΉ]
[o^/C³y[W]
----------
Anderson(11/07(ΰ)11:07)
βHave you got a telephone directory? <a href=" http://www.rabmad.com/authors/#washed ">nizagara vs silagra</a> "For there to be such a case or controversy, it is not enough that the party invoking the power of the court have a keen interest in the issue," he said. "That party must also have "standing," which requires, among other things, that it have suffered a concrete and particularized injury. Because we find that petitioners do not have standing, we have no authority to decide this case on the merits, and neither did the Ninth Circuit."<BR>
[ίι]
\Μ}[N
: QΑ
~ : sQΑ
£ : ’